Legal Opinion

Leicester v. Hoadley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1903No. 12,893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Riley district court ;'W. S. Glass, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

This action was brought by the defendant in error, Mrs. Hoadley, to procure the cancelation and discharge of the record of a judgment held against her by Mrs. Leicester. By her petition it appeared that this judgment was obtained November 11, 1899, and that, by the consideration of the United States district court for the district of Kansas, sitting in bankruptcy, she was discharged from her debts on March 6, 1900, but, notwithstanding such discharge, Mrs. Leicester was still claiming the judgment rendered in her favor to be in full…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . HowNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Colwell v. . TinkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. In re MaplesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1901
  4. Delamater v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. McChristal v. ClisbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Holmstrom v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Thompson v. JudyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Allard v. La PlainWashington Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API