Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Herrera

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2016No. 2d Crim. B261842Published

1Dissent

YEGAN, J., Dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

Until today, it was settled that a mental health expert may not give testimony that *198the defendant did or did not form the mental state required for the crime charged. (Pen.Code, § 29 ; People v. Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 443, 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 541, 297 P.3d 793 ; People v. DeHoyos (2013) 57 Cal.4th 79, 121, 158 Cal.Rptr.3d 797, 303 P.3d 1 ; People v. Halvorsen (2007) 42 Cal.4th 379, 408, 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 721, 165 P.3d 512 ; People v. Coddington (2000) 23 Cal.4th 529, 583, 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 528, 2"…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. San NicolasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. LarsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API