Legal Opinion
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Dyck
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1991No. 90-2538PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated Gov. Bar R. V(5)(a). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. PringleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Akron Bar Assn. v. PringleOhio Supreme Court · 1996