Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Messner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1966Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree appealed from affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to both parties payable out of the estate. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally and Capozzoli, JJ.; Stevens and Steuer, JJ., dissent and vote to modify in a dissenting memorandum by Stevens, J. I dissent and vote to modify the decree appealed from so as to eliminate all payments prior to the delivery of the policy. The general rule is that an annuity commences at the date of the testator’s death unless the will provides otherwise (Kearney v. Cruikshank, 117 N. Y. 95, 100). The Surrogate applied the general rule. With that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Kearney v. . CruikshankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. In re the Final Accounting of SangnierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  4. In re the Estate of MessnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API