Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert A. Tate
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 2016No. 15-3227PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we address two sentencing issues. First, defendant Robert A. Tate challenges the district court’s findings on the extent of his relevant conduct. Those findings were based on credibility determinations to which we give great deference, and we find no error. Second, we must also decide whether a conviction under an Illinois law that prohibits attempted procurement of anhydrous ammonia with intent that it be used to manufacture methamphetamine qualifies as a “controlled substance offense” under the Sentencing Guidelines’ career offender provision,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. AbbasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Terrance E. BlalockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Rodney McLee and Vicki Murph-JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John Doe v. University of Southern IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Nathaniel RuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Martez SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Michael ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Rashid MinhasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.