Legal Opinion

Ross v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1973No. 10994-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals which held, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 42(f)(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.:

“ * * * that petitioner was entitled to disqualify the respondent judge as a matter of right * *

The opinion of the Court of Appeals was filed contemporaneously with the case of Hofstra v. Mahoney, 18 Ariz.App. 4, 499 P.2d 735 (1972). We granted review in Hofstra v. Mahoney, supra, vacated the decision of the Court of Appeals, and dismissed the petition for special action holding that in a divorce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hofstra v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hofstra v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Ross v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. GourdinColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Tyler v. Fred Harvey, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Webber v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Webber v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API