Legal Opinion

Trowbridge v. Denning

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 8, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from the First District Court of the city of Newark.

1Opinion of the Court

*237The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vookhtcks, J.

This is an appeal from the Eirst District Court of the city of Newark. The defendant, engaged in the beer bottling business in the city of Newark, made sale of that business to the plaintiff and his partner, Eoome, and by an instrument in writing covenanted with the plaintiff and his partner “to refrain from engaging in or carrying on a beer bottling business within the limits of the city of Newark for a period of one year, * • * * and also * * * not to assist anyone else so engaged in said beer bottling business for said period in said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Francisco v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Hedge, Elliott & Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Otis v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  2. Nisonoff v. CerebeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API