Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Mittry Bros.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1939No. 4405PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
The appellee filed a claim under the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act, Comp.St.1929, § 156-101 et seq., alleging in substance that he was employed by the appellant, Mittry Brothers (hereinafter called appellant) ; that he was injured in the course of his employment and that appellant refused to pay compensation except in a small amount alleged. That “such injury has caused the ligaments in each side of said claimant to be torn loose, causing claimant to suffer great pain and has caused a total and permanent disability on the part of the claimanf, and is now, and ever since…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cornner v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Telman v. GallesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. SteenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. SenourIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Mitchell v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.