Legal Opinion

United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Garrido

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 2009No. 3D08-2745PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CORTEÑAS, J.

United Automobile Insurance Company (“United”) appeals the county court’s summary judgment in favor of Eduardo Garri-do, (“Dr. Garrido”). The county court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

WHETHER EXPERT TESTIMONY BASED ON A PHYSICIAN’S REPORT THAT WAS NOT FIRST OBTAINED BY THE INSURER BEFORE PIP BENEFITS WERE WITHDRAWN OR DENIED IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY PREDICATE UNDER § 627.736(7)(A), FLA. STAT. (2003) IS ADMISSIBLE TO SUPPORT AN INSURER’S LEGAL DEFENSE ON MEDICAL NECESSITY AND RELATEDNESS IN AN ACTION FOR PIP BENEFITS?

See Fla. R.App. P.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Santa Fe Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. United Automobile Insurance v. Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Professional Medical Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API