Legal Opinion

Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner Rochester Urban Renewal Agency appeals from a judgment awarding respondent $40,000 plus interest and costs for the taking of property located at 22-24 Monroe Avenue, Rochester. The subject consists of one- and two-story structures on 2,918 square feet of land and is situated on the northerly side of Monroe Avenue, approximately 200 feet east of the Clinton Avenue intersection. A two-story brick structure froiits 23 feet on Monroe Avenue and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mtr. of City of Ny (A. & W. Realty Corp.)New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Ridgeway Associates, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Wayside Nurseries, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. WAYSIDE NURSERIES, INC. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peasley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Yonkers City Post No. 1666 v. BottiglieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Yonkers City Post No. 1666, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Inc. v. Josanth Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. International Salt Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1984
  5. YONKERS CITY POST NO. 1666, VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC. v. Josanth Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API