Legal Opinion

Maas v. Nankeville

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, Thirteenth District, borough , of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court, without a jury; and from an order denying the defendant’s -motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

In an action for work, labor and services and materials furnished, the plaintiff gave evidence of an agreed price of $300, but no evidence of reasonable value. The justice awarded him $225 damages. The record shows that this must have been given on the .theory of a quantum meruit. Such being the case, I think the amount was too .great. According to the evidence it should not have been more than $200 at the utmost. The damages should be *638reduced to that amount; and, as thus modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

The appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leavitt v. KatzoffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bellas, Hess & Co. v. LivingstonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  2. Lee v. Revolving Airship Tower Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API