Legal Opinion
Sheryl Crawford v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 31, 1995No. 93-1852PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, a horse owner, challenges a civil penalty imposed under the Horse Protection Act for “allowing” the entry of a “sored” Tennessee Walking horse in a horse show. We deny the petition for review.
I
Petitioner Sheryl Crawford owns and shows “Supreme Image,” a Tennessee Walking horse. Such horses are prized for their distinctive high-stepping gait. Unfortunately, the competitive pressures of the Tennessee Walking horse industry have led some owners to “sore” their horses, inflicting injuries on the horses’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Horse Protection Association, Inc. v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lacson v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- El Conejo Americano of Texas, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- EchoStar Comm Corp v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- McCloy v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.