Yarsulik v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.
The director of the Department of Revenue asks us to determine whether or not a breath analyzer machine’s producing a digital display of a breath test’s results, but not a print-out, establishes that a driver had refused to submit to a chemical analysis contrary to his lawful obligations. We do not reach this issue, however, because the director did not present any evidence that the lack of a print-out resulted from the driver’s refusal to provide an adequate sample. We, therefore, affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
This dispute arose from an arrest of Ronald…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Berry v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Callendar v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bacandreas v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Roberts v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warner v. Missouri Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mings v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bogart v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006