Legal Opinion

McCray v. Dietz

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 11, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-2286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

The petitioner, Stokes McCray, an inmate at Rahway State Prison, moves this court for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56 to redress his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant, Christopher Dietz as chairman of the New Jersey State Parole Board, also moves for summary judgment. The fundamental issue here is whether defendant denied petitioner due process of law by not providing petitioner parole consideration under New Jersey law after he was transferred from the Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC) to Rahway State Prison.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CruzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Gerald v. Com'r, New Jersey Dept. of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. State v. CruzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API