Legal Opinion

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 5, 2000No. 99-1328Published

1Opinion of the Court

210 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2000)

BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,

v.

SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, AROOSTOOK AND BANGOR RESOURCES, INC., DEFENDANTS, APPELLANTS.

No. 99-1328

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Heard October 8, 1999

Decided April 5, 2000

[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Thad B. Zmistowski, with whom Glen L. Porter and Eaton, Peabody, Bradford & Veague, P.A., were on brief for appellants.

Clinton J. Miller, III, General Counsel, for appellee United Transportation Union.

Harold A. Ross,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API