Multinational Force & Observers v. Arrow Air, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT, District Judge.
Peat Marwick Main & Co. (“PMM”) (formerly KMG Main-Hurdman) objects to the production of certain accounting records pertaining to their client Arrow Air and its affiliates. Without reviewing the history of the subpoena, the parties attempted to work out the production of these records to MFO. Notwithstanding these laudable efforts, the parties failed to reach an agreement. Of course, this is not unexpected in light of the high emotion that has permeated this litigation. It, therefore, becomes incumbent upon this Court to resolve the present controversies.
At the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. SykesSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Falsone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kadiyala v. PupkeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- List Industries, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021