Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Rockport Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1932No. 4547PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover damages alleged to have been suffered on account of water being cast upon her land from an irrigation canal belonging to defendant and for an injunction against future injuries. The defendant denied the alleged wrongs complained of by plaintiff, and by counterclaim asserted an easement through the channel of Three Mile creek, a natural stream running across plaintiff’s lands for the purpose of conducting flood and surplus waters from its canal to the Weber river, and prayed for a decree establishing its ownership of the easement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gleason v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. GilbertUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carol L. Lowry Irrevocable Trust v. G & L Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API