Legal Opinion
United States v. A Residence Located at 218 Third Street
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1986No. Nos. 85-3124, 85-3125PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal comes to us from the district court’s denial of a motion by David Lewal-len (“movant”) to order the government to return certain seized property to him. The movant based his motion on two theories: (1) the search warrants used to seize his property were based on false statements by the affiant in violation of the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); and (2) the procedure used to seize movant’s bank records violated 12 U.S.C. § 3420, which is a section of the Right to Financial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Tyrice GloverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Collet WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- United States v. Russell TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.