Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Anctil
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 1965No. 5319PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The first question presented by this case is whether this state recognizes a common-law action for damages for injuries to an intoxicated consumer of liquor who is served additional intoxicating liquor by a liquor licensee. Annot. 75 A.L.R. 2d 833. New Hampshire has no dramshop law or civil damage law, although it did have such a law from 1870 until it was repealed in 1934. Laws 1870, c. 3, s. 3; P. L., c. 144, ss. 52, 53; Laws 1934, c. 3, s. 43. Hollis v. Davis, 56 N. H. 74; Hoyt v. Tilton, 81 N. H. 477; Annot. 64 A.L.R. 2d 705.
The defendant argues that the repeal of our civil damage statute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Mary Ann Waynick v. Chicago's Last Department Store, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Schelin v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Dean v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738, Inc. v. ClaywellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.