Legal Opinion

Echeverria v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 1996No. 95-0725Published

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to suppress. Appellant asserts that his consent to be searched was rendered involuntary due to the arresting officers’ use of drawn weapons and handcuffs. See Reynolds v. State, 592 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1992).

Although we do not condone the use of drawn weapons or handcuffs in every Terry stop, such actions are lawful where officers believe that their use is “reasonably necessary to protect the officers’ safety or to thwart a suspect’s attempt to flee.” Id. at 1084. See also Wilson v. State, 547 So.2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. State v. SayersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API