Gerish v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT court OE NICOLLET COUNTY. The points and authorities filed by Plaintiff in Error, are not pertinent to any of tbe questions decided by tbe Court, but relate to tbe power of tbe Court to modify and amend tbe judgment.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT court OE NICOLLET COUNTY. The points and authorities filed by Plaintiff in Error, are not pertinent to any of tbe questions decided by tbe Court, but relate to tbe power of tbe Court to modify and amend tbe judgment. Points and authorities of Defendant in Error: First. — Defendant in error respectfully claims, that this honorable Court has jurisdiction herein upon this writ of error, founded on any final judgment or decree made or rendered in this action in tbe Court below. Because, writ “shall not issue after tbe expiration of one year from tbe time of tbe rendition of…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
Flahdeau, J.
This was an action for the recovery of the possession of personal property. The complaint is very imperfect, and was demurred to by the Defendants. The demurrer was sustained by the Court below with leave to the Plaintiff to amend, which he did not avail himself of. Thereupon the Defendant moved for judgment, and the Court on the 31st day of December, 1858, rendered judgment in his favor, which, after reciting the preliminary steps that had been taken, grants the following relief: “ It is adjudged and decreed that the Defendants have final judgment for the return, to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Haley v. Eureka County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1889
- Nicklin v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Holmes v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Washburn v. SharpeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Cline v. DuffyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.