Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
Much of what is said in the majority opinion would be unanswerable if we had the fact-finding function. Our review is limited to determining whether or not there is any evidence or any inference permissible therefrom to sustain the finding of the commission. Jeffers v. Borgen Chevrolet Co. 199 Minn. 348,272 N.W. 172; Bronson v. National Battery Broadcasting Co. Inc. 200 Minn. 237,273 N.W. 681; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498, 204 N.W. 635.
1. Of course there can be no liability unless there was an employment. In some of the cases we speak about the right of control as being a test by which to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Ledoux v. JoncasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Billmayer v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Wass v. Bracker Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Storrs v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.