Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Murphy & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Hammond. Bichmond superior court. October 30, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, J.,

1. Although section 4775 of the Civil Code requires an officer, who is called on by rule nisi to show cause why he should' not pay over money alleged to have been collected by him, to file an answer under oath, “taken at the time the answer is filed,” yet an omission to verify the answer is a curable defect. Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 131 Ga. 701 (63 S. E. 221), and cit.

2. Although rules against officers do not come within the purview of statutes regulating- defaults for failure to plead at the return term of suits, but are matters governed to a considerable extent by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. BrinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Hendricks v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Pace v. TarverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API