Legal Opinion

Eggleston v. Austin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Sedgwick District Court. . Action brought by Austin agaiust Eggleston, to recover compensation as a real-estate broker for selling certain land belonging to defendant. Trial at the December Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by A. L. Austin against B. B. Eggleston, to recover compensation as a real-estate broker for selling certain land belonging to Eggleston. Judgment was rendered in the court below in favor of the plaintiff, Austin; and the defendant, Eggleston, now brings the case to this court.

The plaintiff in error submits three principal questions to to this court: First, that the evidence' introduced in the court below does not sustain the verdict and judgment rendered in that court; second, that the court below erred in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beougher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. McGuire v. CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Latshaw v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Johnson v. DysertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Hieronymus v. AtterburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API