Parrish v. Adams
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition for injunction; from Bibb. Motion to dismiss. James E. Laidler was the owner of certain promissory notes made by Mrs. Annie L. Subers, in which he was named as payee. He was also the grantee in a deed conveying described land in a city, on which there was a dwelling; the deed having been executed for the purpose of securing the notes. One of the notes was for a named sum as principal, with interest from maturity.
Read the full summary
Petition for injunction; from Bibb. Motion to dismiss. James E. Laidler was the owner of certain promissory notes made by Mrs. Annie L. Subers, in which he was named as payee. He was also the grantee in a deed conveying described land in a city, on which there was a dwelling; the deed having been executed for the purpose of securing the notes. One of the notes was for a named sum as principal, with interest from maturity. The others were for the interest on the first note from its date to maturity, and were to bear interest themselves after maturity. The first note contained a clause binding…
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
Mrs. Subers was not made a party defendant in error, nor was there any service of the bill of exceptions upon her; nor was service acknowledged by her or for her by another duly authorized, with consent that she be made a party by amendment in the Supreme Court, and that the case proceed, as provided under the Civil Code, § 6160, par. 3. A motion was made to dismiss the bill of exceptions, on the ground that Mrs. Subers would be affected by the judgment to be rendered in the case, and was not made a party defendant in error or served with the bill of exceptions. If Mrs. Subers was affected…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Davis v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Bank of Dalton v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927