Britton Milling Co. v. Williams
South Dakota Supreme Court
On rehearing. (1) To point one of the opinion, French, Orvis & French, as amici curiae, on behalf of Appellant cited: Sec. 1892, Code 1919; Sec. 1763; Builder’s Lime & Cement Co. v. Weimer, 170 Ia. 444, 151 N. W. 100; Brannon on Negotiable Instruments Law, Sec. 52. Appellant cited: Respondent cited: Sec. 1756, Code 1919; McCormick Harvester Co. v. Taylor (N. D.), 63 N. W. 890; Bradshaw v. Miners Bank of Joplin, 81 Fed. 902; Creighton Plow Co. v. Davidson (Neb.), 20 N. W.…
Read the full summary
On rehearing. (1) To point one of the opinion, French, Orvis & French, as amici curiae, on behalf of Appellant cited: Sec. 1892, Code 1919; Sec. 1763; Builder’s Lime & Cement Co. v. Weimer, 170 Ia. 444, 151 N. W. 100; Brannon on Negotiable Instruments Law, Sec. 52. Appellant cited: Respondent cited: Sec. 1756, Code 1919; McCormick Harvester Co. v. Taylor (N. D.), 63 N. W. 890; Bradshaw v. Miners Bank of Joplin, 81 Fed. 902; Creighton Plow Co. v. Davidson (Neb.), 20 N. W. 256; Bank of Gresham v. Walch (Oreg.), 147 Pac. 530; Vanderploeg v. Van Zook, 135 Ia. 350, 112 N. W. 807, 13 L. R. A. (N.…
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
This case is before the court on rehearing. The former opinion was filed on the 31st day of August, 1921, and will be found reported in 184 N. W. at page 265.
The second proposition considered by the court on the former hearing — relating to commercial paper — was regarded as of so much importance to the bar arid the commercial interests of the *276state that several law firms asked' and were granted permission to appear as amici curiae, and take part in presenting the case at the rehearing. Pursuant to such permission the firms of French, Orvis & French qnd Caldwell & Caldwell, each filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- St. Charles Savings Bank v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Merchants' National Bank v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Southern National Life Realty Corp. v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Bank of Commerce & Savings v. RandellNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reitz v. Ampro Royalty TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Wakonda State Bank v. FairfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Security Holding Co. v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- First Nat. Bank v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Britton Milling Co. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.