Legal Opinion
Di Loreto v. Stockman
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1984Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John S. Lockman, J.
This proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 for an order vacating and setting aside the determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Village of Matinecock which granted respondents Alfred and Barbara Devendorf area and width variances is disposed of as set forth below.
*978Respondents Alfred and Barbara Devendorf are the owners of a parcel located within the Village of Matinecock and known as Section 23, Block K, Lot 646. The parcel is in excess of four acres in area and is situated in an area zoned for two-acre residential housing. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Holy Spirit Ass'n v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Condé Nast Publications, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Von Kohorn v. MorrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Fredonia Products Co. v. ProcaccinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.