Legal Opinion

Aitchison v. Aitchison

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1896PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. N. W. Maoy, Judge. Action for divorce and for alimony, and the custody of the two minor children of these parties. The causes for divorce alleged are inhuman treatment, such as to endanger the life of the plaintiff, and adultery. Defendant answered, denying both of these charges, and a decree was rendered dismissing the plaintiff’s petition, from which decree she appealed.—

1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.

I. These parties — young, intelligent, educated, of good habits, and highly esteemed by their acquaintances — were married on January 80, 1890. Their surroundings gave promise of a happy married life, yet since April 20, 1894, they have lived apart from each other, and the plaintiff is now demanding a divorce upon the grounds already stated. We are not to 'determine which of these parties is at fault, or most at fault, in bringing about this unfortunate estrangement that has arisen between them. We'are to determine from the evidence whether either or both of the causes for divorce alleged are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knight v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Vanduzer v. VanduzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Inskeep v. InskeepSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Weatherill v. WeatherillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Dillavou v. DillavouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API