Legal Opinion

Olney v. Schurr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1936No. 121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*631OPINION

By BARNES, PJ.

No interrogatories were submitted to the jury and therefore it is not ascertainable upon which ground, mental incapacity or undue influence, the will was set aside. It therefore follows that we have present a situation whereby the two-issue rule must be considered.

Very able and comprehensive briefs have been filed by counsel representing the respective parties. The following claimed errors are presented:

1. Said court erred in overruling the motion of defendant made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, and at the close of all the testimony, to direct a verdict in favor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heiselmann v. FranksOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carson v. Beatley, Exrx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API