English v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
In a prior tort action against the appellee, the appellant, prior to verdict, submitted a written paper to the judge stating that she "moves for a voluntary dismissal.” (Emphasis supplied.) The judge had the court reporter mark it as an exhibit, and when the plaintiff handed it back to the judge, the latter looked at it and stated, "I can tell you that that is not sufficient under the law.” The judge refused to discharge the jury, which deliberated for several more hours without objection by the plaintiffs counsel before returning a verdict for the defendant. Within 6 months…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. CartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Hospital Authority v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Woods v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Spence v. DyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Nunnery v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Wilson v. Barton & Ludwig, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Young v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Smith v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Storch v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.