Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Mullen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. 27308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

The only question involved is whether the appellant, Haw*568kins, was entitled to a stay of nine months as if upon a decree for the sale of mortgaged premises.

The decree was entered pursuant to a mandate in Hawkins v. Mullen, 118 Neb. 129. The nature of the case must be stated to understand the issue involved here. Hawkins brought suit to quiet title against various parties. He obtained a favorable decree against all of them in the district court. Two of them appealed. One was Farmers Union Cooperative Association. It had a mechanic’s lien arising by reason of repairs and improvements upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. BirdsallNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Clark v. PahlNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hawkins v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Spencer v. MoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbus Land, Loan & Building Ass'n v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API