Miguel Chavez v. State

OPINION

Opinion by

STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.

Miguel Chavez was charged by indictment with the offense of murder. A jury found Chavez guilty and the trial court sentenced him to 60 years imprisonment. Chavez appeals his conviction, arguing (1) the evidence was factually insufficient to support the verdict, and (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his previous altercation with the victim. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Factual Sufficiency

When considering a factual sufficiency challenge, we look at the evidence in a neutral light giving almost complete deference to the jury’s…