Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weisberg v. Pickens

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1989No. 1—88—3552Published

1DissentJustice Buckley

I respectfully dissent.

When determining whether a litigant has complied with the statutory requirements which would entitle the litigant to an absolute right to change in venue without inquiry into the propriety of his petition asserting prejudice, the statutory requirements are to be liberally construed in order to effect rather than defeat a change of venue, particularly where judicial prejudice is charged. (Frede v. McDaniels (1976), 37 Ill. App. 3d 1053, 347 N.E.2d 259.) Defendant here has not disputed plaintiffs compliance with statutory requirements as to the form of the petition, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Intini v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Hutson v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Frede v. McDanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Anderson v. City of WheatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API