Legal Opinion

Klein v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1961No. 157-58PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaeeR, Judge

This case is before us on plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.

In our opinion, delivered on November 2,1960, ante, p. 208, we held that defendant had taken an easement of flight over plaintiffs’ property in April 1947, when defendant began flying jet planes over the property at low altitudes with the intention of continuing to do so at will. We reaffirm that holding. However, we have come to the conclusion that we were in error in holding that plaintiffs’ cause of action was barred because not brought within sis years from that date. In so holding we did not give effect to the principle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Highland Park Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Grace E. Avery v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Aaron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API