Legal Opinion
Sam Young Chung v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of a resettled and amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), entered February 23, 1993, as, upon a prior jury verdict finding the plaintiff 5% at fault in the happening of the accident and the defendant 95% at fault in the happening of the accident, and upon a subsequent jury verdict awarding the plaintiff damages for past pain and suffering in the sum of $2,700,000, and upon an order dated November 30, 1992, granting the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict for past pain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cranston v. Oxford Resources Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Venable v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Sam Young Chung v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hotaling v. CSX TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Keaney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- De La Cruz v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Driscolll v. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Angerome v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.