Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In the Interest of D. J.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 2013No. A12A2176Published

1ConcurrenceBarnes, Presiding Judge

While I agree with the outcome reached in this case, I do not agree with all that is said by the majority. Therefore, this opinion decides only the issues in this case and may not be cited as binding precedent. See Court of Appeals Rule 33 (a). I write separately to emphasize that even if a parent has completed most of his or her case plan and wishes to be part of the child’s life, termination of parental *257rights still may be appropriate where there is evidence that the parent has a medically verifiable mental disability that renders the parent unable to care for the essential needs of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of H. F. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. In the Interest of C. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API