Legal Opinion

People v. Bryant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of rape in the first degree, defendant contends that the prosecutor impermissibly used a peremptory challenge to exclude the only prospective black juror (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Scott, 70 NY2d 420). At his trial in 1983, before Batson was decided, defendant complained that the prosecutor’s peremptory challenge to the single black potential juror resulted in an all-white jury deciding whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. LincolnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. BryantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Bryant v. SpeckardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API