Legal Opinion
State v. Hurd
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 1983No. 13032PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
A jury has found defendant Pamela Sue Hurd guilty of disposing of stolen property having a value of more than $150, as defined and denounced by § 570.080.3, RSMo 1978. 1 Her punishment was assessed at imprisonment for a term of four years, as authorized by former § 558.011.1(3). She appeals.
Having had a verdict, the State is entitled to the most favorable view of the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, and to have this court disregard defendant’s evidence except as it supports the verdict. State v. Jones, 594 S.W.2d 932, 934—935[1][2] (Mo.1980). The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. RoyalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. RojanasathitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bushong v. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.