Legal Opinion

Rich v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1916No. Civ. No. 1595PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to secure an annulment of an order dismissing a justice’s court appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

One Harvey Carlton, on the twenty-first day of June, 1916, recovered judgment against the petitioners in the justice’s court of Little Lake Township, in the county of Mendocino, for the sum of $115.35, together with costs of suit, taxed at $8.75. Thereafter, and within the time allowed by law, the petitioners appealed from said judgment to the superior court, in and for the county of Mendocino, said appeal being upon questions of both law and fact. The petitioners, in due time, filed the following undertaking:

“Whereas, on the 21st day of June, A. D. 1916, a judgment was entered in said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McConky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ward v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Jones v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Police Court of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Hafer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Hafer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API