In re M.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
*59A.M. ("Respondent-mother") appeals from the trial court's permanency planning order prohibiting contact between her child, M.M. ("Margo"),1 and Margo's maternal grandfather (the "maternal grandfather"). After *223careful review, we vacate in part and remand for further proceedings.
Factual Background
This is Respondent-mother's third appeal in this matter. Margo was first removed from the custody of Respondent-mother and Margo's father2 on 8 August 2007 based on confirmed drug use by the parents and following multiple incidents of domestic violence in their home. In re M.M. , 212…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Petersen v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re M.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re N.T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011