Legal Opinion

In re M.M.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2016No. COA16-77Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

*59A.M. ("Respondent-mother") appeals from the trial court's permanency planning order prohibiting contact between her child, M.M. ("Margo"),1 and Margo's maternal grandfather (the "maternal grandfather"). After *223careful review, we vacate in part and remand for further proceedings.

Factual Background

This is Respondent-mother's third appeal in this matter. Margo was first removed from the custody of Respondent-mother and Margo's father2 on 8 August 2007 based on confirmed drug use by the parents and following multiple incidents of domestic violence in their home. In re M.M. , 212…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Petersen v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. In re M.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. In re N.T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API