Prentice v. How
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Mills, J., entered July 1, 1913, in favor of the defendants, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCnow, J.
This action was commenced by John Prentice against Franklin How, a minor, Wong How, his guardian, Wong How and Ong How, his wife, and Horrigan Brothers Company, a corporation, to recover possession of and quiet title to lot 12 in block 3, Northern Pacific Railroad Company’s plat of Pasco. From a decree in favor of the defendants Franklin How and Horrigan Brothers Company, a corporation, the plaintiff has appealed.
Wong How, one of the defendants herein, is a Chinaman and an alien. Franklin How, a minor, son of Wong How and his wife, is a native of the United States and the state of Washington.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abrams v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Atkinson v. World Real Estate Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Philadelphia Mortgage and Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Johnson v. BartlettWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Carpenter v. SherfyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Terrace v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1921
- State v. KosaiWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Dutton v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Suwa v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Caparell v. GoodbodyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.