Legal Opinion

Pardo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 1983No. 82-52PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

429 So.2d 1313 (1983)

Rene PARDO, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-52.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 20, 1983.

Richard A. Manzo and Ernest C. Wright of Manzo, Rogers & Wright, Titusville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

This case involves the admissibility in evidence in a criminal case of the result of a blood alcohol test taken without compliance with the provisions of sections 322.261 and 322.262, Florida Statutes (1981).

Appellant, operator of a vehicle at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Sambrine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. RooseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. State v. GeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. State v. HiltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. State v. McInnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API