Legal Opinion

Dupree v. Patchett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 2005No. 4-05-0211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Turner

On February 15, 2005, plaintiff, Cedric Dupree, filed a pro se petition for mandamus against defendant, Court of Claims Judge Randy Patchett, asserting he was denied his right to due process because Judge Patchett had failed to rule on his petition and motions in case No. 93 — CC—0339. On February 16, 2005, the trial court dismissed sua sponte defendant’s petition, finding it lacked jurisdiction over the matter.

Plaintiff appeals pro se, contending the trial court erred in dismissing his mandamus petition. This court reviews de novo a trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of a mandamus petition.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Torres v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rossetti Contracting Co. v. Court of ClaimsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People Ex Rel. Harrod v. Illinois Courts CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Jaros v. Illinois Court of ClaimsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  3. Sherrod v. BirnbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Dupree v. PatchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API