Commonwealth v. Rainelli

BROWN JR., P.J.,

Presently before the court is defendant David Rainelli’s motion to suppress. Said motion is denied. The court determines defendant need not be individually named on the application or order for interception of wire and electronic communications.

FINDINGS OF FACT(1) On June 29,2005, this court granted defendant post-conviction relief in the form of a new trial.(2) On April 28, 1998, Judge Zoran Popovich of the Pennsylvania Superior Court signed an order authorizing the interception of wire and electronic communica*429tions from the telephone of Andrew Bekes, an individual being…