Legal Opinion

In re Bernard C.

New York City Family Court

Decided January 29, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mary E. Bednar, J.

I

In this juvenile delinquency proceeding, the New York City Police Department, a nonparty, has moved for an order quashing a subpoena duces tecum dated January 3, 1996, which directs the Department to produce, inter alla, "[a]ll documents concerning the [Family Court] Detective Squad, including, without limitation, documents concerning its actual or prospective activities, duties, authority, responsibility, purpose, functions, or procedures”, as well as a subpoena duces tecum, also dated January 3, 1996, which is directed to Detective Bari Moody, which…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deshawn E. ex rel. Charlotte E. v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Deshawn E. v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. In re Antonia E.New York City Family Court · 2007
  4. Matter of Antonia E.New York Family Court, Queens County · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API