Legal Opinion

State v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2000No. C1-98-1418PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, C.J.

On direct appeal of appellant Steven James Erickson’s multiple felony convictions, we determined that four errors occurred during his trial. See State v. Erickson, 597 N.W.2d 897, 899 (Minn.1999) (.Erickson I). We remanded to the trial court for a Schwartz hearing to determine the degree of prejudice, if any, caused appellant by the errors. 1 See id. The trial court found that the errors had no effect on the jurors’ deliberations or their opinion of appellant’s guilt or innocence. After considering the evidence gathered at the Schwartz hearing, we conclude that appellant was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. GreerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API