Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 21, 1943No. 37077Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

If we were to construe the provisions of Article 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as the learned and able attorneys for the, defendant contend that we should and as the dissenting opinion maintains is the correct interpretation, the Article would be either completely and absolutely ineffective or unconstitutional. If the motion to quash must be filed within the three judicial days after the Grand Jury is drawn, it would be impossible for the Grand Jury to be impaneled and sworn and to function by hearing the testimony and considering the evidence produced…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API