Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maloy v. Stuttgart Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 28, 1994No. 93-606Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice

I dissent. The majority opinion will have a greater impact on the citizens of Arkansas than appears at first glance. Many families, as is common practice, create accounts in the names of a parent and one or more child. Certainly most are unaware how easily a creditor of one of the children can access the funds placed in those accounts, which is the result of the majority’s ruling.

The majority relies on Hayden v. Gardner. 238 Ark. 351, 381 S.W.2d 752 (1964), calling it the seminal case in Arkansas on the question of garnishment of a joint banking account. Hayden determined that a joint account…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayden v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Irvin v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Knighton v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Ragan v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. McLarty Leasing System, Inc. v. BlackshearCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API