Legal Opinion

Dannheim v. Babbitt

New York City Family Court

Decided November 8, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam W. Serra, J.

An application is made by counsel for the petitioner in the above-entitled matter for allowance of counsel fees under section 438 of article 4 of the Family Court Act. The circumstances of the proceeding are substantially as follows: A proceeding was initially brought under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law of the State of Pennsylvania and of the State of New York (Domestic Relations Law, art. 3-A, §§ 30-43) for support from the respondent for his son. Upon the return of the proceeding, it was determined by the court that the respondent had fully and adequately and regularly for a period…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HelmsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Davis Ex Rel. Grant v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Kommel v. KarronAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinNew York City Family Court · 1968
  2. MacFadden v. MartiniNew York City Family Court · 1983
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API