City of Akron v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
In 1969, after this court’s decision in Cincinnati Gas & Electric v. Pub. Util. Comm., supra (173 Ohio St. 473), federal tax law was modified with respect to the use of accelerated depreciation for public utilities. Present Section 167(l) of the Internal Revenue Code, and others which authorize the accelerated depreciation method, are somewhat tangled, but their effect is clear, as every witness before the board agreed. The statute requires that if a public utility uses accelerated depreciation, it must normalize. If normalization is denied and the utility is required to flow through, the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State ex rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ohio Edison Co. v. SouleOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Ohio Ass'n of Realtors v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979